New Live Show Number: 641-715-3636 pin 883267#

New Live Show Number: 641-715-3836 pin 883267#

↑Monday's thru Thur's,Join Us Live

Diamonds Show Monday - Thurs 8:30 pm EST, Surprise! segment, Cynthia with Astrology, Candy shop news, Special Guests, Building Relations with OUR Star Families with Chris, Learning "Who YOU Really are"

Recorded Line Via Phone 641-715-3813 pin 883267# Press # for the most recent call, or enter a previous reference # (Call by Skype phone via Skype credits or Skype phone using same number & pin above.)


Saturday, August 31, 2013

THIS IS A REMARKABLE IDEA. FINALLY!! LETS MAKE SURE THE CONGRESS AND SENATE STEER THIS FOR WHAT "WE THE PEOPLE" WANT. OK?




President Obama: 'I Will Seek Authorization' from Congress


WASHINGTON, DC
Saturday, August 31, 2013

In a statement from the Rose Garden, Saturday, President Obama said that he will seek Congressional authorization for an air strike on Syrian military targets. He said that the chemical weapons attack could lead to the proliferation of those weapons. "This menace must be confronted," he said.
He said, however, that he was comfortable acting without international support or a U.N. mandate.
The President said he had spoken with the House speaker, House minority leader and the Senate minority and majority leaders and they agreed to hold a debate and vote as soon as Congress returned to session.
The White House is scheduled to hold a conference call, Saturday, to brief Senators. House members will recieve a classified briefing on Sunday.
The Associated Press is reporting that the President is considering requesting Congressional approval before taking any action






Even Ron Paul...YES...Ron Paul says it might be a FALSE FLAG.



US Finally Admits What Ron Paul Said: "Nobody Knows Who Set Off The Gas"
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 08/29/2013 12:39 -0400
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-08-29/us-finally-admits-what-ron-paul-said-nobody-knows-who-launched-chemical-attack

The AP reports that US intelligence officials are admitting that linking Syrian President Bashar Assad or his inner circle to an alleged chemical weapons attack is no "slam dunk," as opposed to Obama (and Kerry) who are 'unequivocal' of the fact.

Via AP,

The intelligence linking Syrian President Bashar Assad or his inner circle to an alleged chemical weapons attack is no "slam dunk," with questions remaining about who actually controls some of Syria's chemical weapons stores and doubts about whether Assad himself ordered the strike, U.S. intelligence officials say.

...

an intercept of Syrian military officials discussing the strike was among low-level staff, with no direct evidence tying the attack back to an Assad insider or even a senior Syrian commander, the officials said.

So while Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday that links between the attack and the Assad government are "undeniable," U.S. intelligence officials are not so certain that the suspected chemical attack was carried out on Assad's orders, or even completely sure it was carried out by government forces, the officials said.

...
Perhaps more concerning...

Another possibility that officials would hope to rule out: that stocks had fallen out of the government's control and were deployed by rebels in a callous and calculated attempt to draw the West into the war.

"The danger of escalation with Russia is very high," Ron Paul warns in this brief Fox News interview. After casting doubts on the government's 'knowledge' and reasoning in the region, Paul gets straight to the point. Simply put, he notes, despite the ongoing headlines of 'proof' and 'dreadful videos', Paul states "We're not positive who set off the gas," and indeed - who is set to benefit most from any Assad-regime-smackdown? Al-Qaeda.


"Assad is not an idiot," Paul adds, "it's unlikely he would do this on purpose... look how many lies were told to us about Saddam Hussein prior to that build-up." A lot of uncomrtable truths in this brief clip for an administration that has crossed its own red line (as we noted here) on actions against Syria now... "I think it's a false flag..." Paul adds, there is a big risk that "we are getting sucked in" and the American people are against this war



Congress putting the brakes on Obama
by  Robert Naiman, Common Dreams    …with  Press TV

[Editors Note: Dear all, now is the time to grab your telephone pitch forks and get those calls in to the White house, your Congressman  and both Senators. Give them congrats or spanking accordingly. They need to be shocked when they get back after Labor Day if they don't get called back anyway. A debate will give us more time to find more holes in their bogus gassing scam and expose them enough to demand an investigation now for treason for 'someone' attempting to launch the country into a military endeavor where their is not threat...Jim W. Dean]
______________________________

By my count, at least 162 Members of the House of Representatives, including 64 Democrats, have done at least one of the following things in the last few days:

1) signed a letter initiated by California Democrat Barbara Lee saying that there must be Congressional debate and vote before war with Syria;

2) signed a letter initiated by Virginia Republican Scott Rigell saying that there must be Congressional debate and vote before war with Syria

3) issued a statement calling for a Congressional debate and vote before war with Syria. I don’t claim that this count is exhaustive. If you know of other examples, please share them in the comments.

By my count, at least 64 Democrats in the House have done at least one of these three things. Add this to the 98 Republicans who signed the Rigell letter and you get 162.
____________________________________

These are the 54 Democratic signers of the Lee letter, according to Lee’s office:
Barbara Lee, Mike Honda, Lois Capps, Zoe Lofgren, John Lewis, Jackie Speier, Ra?l Grijalva, Robin Kelly, Beto O’Rourke, Michael H. Michaud, Mark Pocan, Peter A. DeFazio, Peter Welch, Chellie Pingree, Nydia M. Vel?zquez, Sam Farr, Stephen F. Lynch, Lloyd Doggett, Janice Hahn, Jared Huffman, Tulsi Gabbard, Emanuel Cleaver, Rush Holt, Jim McDermott, Sheila Jackson Lee, Eddie Bernice Johnson, Suzanne Bonamici, José E. Serrano, George Miller, Donna F. Edwards, Robert C. “Bobby” Scott, Steve Cohen, Marcy Kaptur, Danny K. Davis, Alcee L. Hastings, James P. McGovern, Judy Chu, Marcia L. Fudge, Alan S. Lowenthal, Charles B. Rangel, Bobby L. Rush, Carolyn B. Maloney, Janice Schakowsky, Donna M. Christensen, David Loebsack, Richard M. Nolan, Henry A. Waxman, Diana DeGette, Yvette D. Clarke, Keith Ellison, Niki Tsongas, Eleanor Holmes Norton, John A. Yarmuth, Julia Brownley.

These are the 18 Democratic signers among the 116 signers of the Rigell letter, as noted by The Hill: Zoe Lofgren, Rush Holt, Beto O’Rourke, Peter DeFazio, Kurt Schrader, William Enyart, Tim Walz, Sam Farr, Bruce Braley, Jim McDermott, Michael Capuano, Anna Eshoo, Earl Blumenauer, Peter Welch, Rick Nolan, David Loebsack, Jim Matheson, Collin Peterson.

Sixty-three Democrats signed at least one of the two letters.  In addition, New York Democrat Jerry Nadler put out a statement saying that there must be a debate and vote.

Why does this matter? It matters because if President Obama were to strike Syria without Congressional authorization, he would violate the Constitution and the War Powers Resolution.
But it also matters because debate surfaces key information. Earlier this week, press was reporting that the U.S. bombing of Syria could start as early as Thursday. By Thursday, here had been no bombing.
Is the Navy being misused? Have rogue elements
 penetrated us again to supply false Intel?

Instead, on Thursday, AP reported that “the intelligence linking Syrian President Bashar Assad or his inner circle to an alleged chemical weapons attack that killed at least 100 people is no ‘slam dunk,’” and that this “uncertainty calls into question the statements by Kerry and Vice President Joe Biden”.

So while Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday that links between the attack and the Assad government are “undeniable,” U.S. intelligence officials are not so certain that the suspected chemical attack was carried out on Assad’s orders, or even completely sure it was carried out by government forces, the officials said.

Ideally, the White House seeks intelligence that links the attack directly to Assad or someone in his inner circle to rule out the possibility that a rogue element of the military decided to use chemical weapons without Assad’s authorization.

Another possibility that officials would hope to rule out: that stocks had fallen out of the government’s control and were deployed by rebels in a callous and calculated attempt to draw the West into the war.

Kerry had said: “We know that the Syrian regime maintains custody of these chemical weapons.”
By Thursday, we knew that what Kerry said on Monday was not true. He said “we know.” But, according the U.S. intelligence officials cited by AP, we don't know.

If the bombing had happened on Thursday, then the bombing would have happened before AP reported that what Kerry said on Monday was not true.

Can people still say with a straight face that Congress shouldn't debate and vote before the President attacks Syria, or that it doesn't matter if they do?

If you think Congress should debate and vote before any war with Syria, you can join 25,000 people at MoveOn.org in telling Congress.
Editing:  Jim W. Dean
























Thursday, August 29, 2013

THESE ART PIECES WILL HEAL YOU!!! CHECK IT OUT Elizabeth Diamond

Joy

The vibration of the state of exalted happiness. This is one of the highest vibrations in our time-space reality. It is particularly good for anyone who suffers from depression, pessimistic thoughts, dysthymia, worry or seasonal affective disorder (seasonal light depression)

Main_joy-teal-eye-print-store

Purchase Prints                         http://www.thespiritualcatalyst.com/paintings


Purchase Products                

Joy

The vibration of the state of exalted happiness. This is one of the highest vibrations in our time-space reality. It is particularly good for anyone who suffers from depression, pessimistic thoughts, dysthymia, worry or seasonal affective disorder (seasonal light depression)

Main_joy-teal-eye-print-store

Purchase Prints

Purchase Product


Here Are our Last Three Exstended Diamonds Forever Calls Click on the Links and Enjoy. Elizabeth Diamond

Diamondsforever31

Join us every Thursday for the 30 minute World News Update at 7 p.m. Central. The extended Diamonds call is every other Saturday at 1 p.m. Central. The call in number is 209-255-1000, pin 883267#. The replay number is 209-255-1099, same pin number. Enter the reference number or press # for the most recent call. Email: DiamondsForever31@yahoo.com




http://rs3104.freeconferencecall.com:80/fcci/cgi-bin/play.mp3/36266124-60.mp3   THIS TALKING GALACTIC


http://rs3104.freeconferencecall.com:80/fcci/cgi-bin/play.mp3/36266124-63.mp3   THIS TALKING GALACTIC


http://rs3104.freeconferencecall.com:80/fcci/cgi-bin/play.mp3/36266124-65.mp3    THIS ONE ONLY 10MN LONG

http://rs3104.freeconferencecall.com:80/fcci/cgi-bin/play.mp3/36266124-2.mp3       THIS NUMBER 2 SHOW


 http://rs3104.freeconferencecall.com:80/fcci/cgi-bin/play.mp3/36266124-67.mp3

"HEALING" You say??? Spiritual Mental Emotional Physical These Two Sisters of OURs are AWESOME!!! Remember: "We Are All ONE"



Listen to this several times, WOW, lots of  "good Vibrations", it's like a tuning fork, tuning another tuning fork (US!! the Diamonds we are!!).   http://tnano.net/




tNANO Healing Music:





This Lady (Teal) is Awesome!! You get lots of Healing, Spiritual, Mental, Emotional, Physical, direction from her.                                                    http://www.youtube.com/user/TheSpiritualCatalyst
TEAL is an artist...and much more......http://www.thespiritualcatalyst.com/         http://www.tealeye.com/
Preview_alignment-teal-eye-print-store 

Alignment



Wednesday, August 28, 2013

IT'S TIME TO TAKE A STAND AGAIN. LETS CLAIM BACK OUR SODVERIEGNTY!!! LET THIS DAY ENCOURGE YOU!! Elizabeth Diamond


"We The People, are the Masters...we are the co-operatives to un-coperative with the corporate brainwashing matrix we now live in!!! Stand up people!! Awaken out of your slumber!! Take a Stand, Now!! Lets, in a unified, peacefull, courageous, fearless stance. STAND UP TOGETHER AND TAKE OUR SOVERIEGNTY BACK!!!  Please. It IS Time. NOW.

Be sure to click on (50th anniversary of March on Washington) to listen to OUR President speak. He encourages us to take a stand also....listen to all....but specifically the 3min at end of his speech.











  • 50th Anniversary of March on Washington

    Play
    Pres. Obama, civil rights leaders and contemporary movement leaders speak on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial for the "Let Freedom Ring" ceremony to commemorate the 50th Anniversary of the March on Washington, held on August 28, 1963.

    C-SPAN's coverage of the ceremony also features remarks from former Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, the King Family, Oprah Winfrey, Ambassador Andrew Young, the daughter of President Lyndon Baines Johnson as well as leaders from national and international organizations.

    President Obama speaks in the same spot where Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. delivered his "I Have a Dream" speech 50 years ago

                                                                 

Diamondsforever.blogspot.com     Diamonds 30min world news update every thursdays 7pm central and exstended Diamond call every other saturday, next August 30 at 1pm central    209-255-1000                  pin 883267#    recorded line 209-255-1099 pin 883267#  (shows 1 thru 68)  Enjoy!! if you dare.

 

 

 

President Obama speaks on the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington - Full speech 8/28/2013

Published on Aug 28, 2013
US President Obama speech address mark 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr "I have a dream" speech in Washington President Obama takes the podium at MLK celebration President Obama is now speaking at #MOW50.President Obama: full speech Martin Luther King i have a dream "Five decades ago today, Americans came—to this honored place—to lay claim to a promise made at our founding." "Five decades ago today, Americans came to this honored place to lay claim to a promise made at our founding" - President Obama Obama "Everyone realizes what those glorious patriots knew on that day-changes do not come from Washington but to Washington" full video speech address

As I post this President Obama is on national mall speaking, were Dr King spoke, the anniversary, they say "after Dr Martin Luther King spoke that day, Nothing Was never the same after that day"....good happened....let this be a sign for that TODAY!! I Declare. Elizabeth Diamond

Martin Luther King - I Have A Dream Speech - August 28, 1963

I Have a Dream Speech Martin Luther King's Address at March on Washington August 28, 1963. Washington, D.C. When we let ... " style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; background-color: transparent; display: block;"I Have a Dream Speech Martin Luther King's Address at March on Washington August 28, 1963. Washington, D.C. When we let ...

I LOVE SYNCRONICITIES!!!!!

Just thinking about What the big news will trigger the masses to awake.......like my post on  Mon August 19 2013.......while thinking about this i checked the diamonds blog stats and look at the SYNCHRONICITY............


                       Diamondsforever31

Pageview chart 911 pageviews - 24 posts, last published on Aug 27, 2013


Here is a Free Book (911 real truth) that just came out yesterday:    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fk8hGIvuOKI     



My Intuition ON All This

Well, the following has been in my thoughts and in my heart for a week or sooo, here it is. As thinking on all these world changes, and our awakening, the rest of our DNA turning on, us taking our soverienty back, and our value, our energy that has been stolen from each of us exponentially, (thats our financial system in a way, if you can begin to understand this). There HAS to be a BIG Trigger to awake the rest, to help us STAND UP and say: "NO MORE BULLSHIT"!!

What if at almost the same time: The Real Truth of princes Diana's and her boyfriends death comes out.  The Real Truth of  9/11 and the twin towers comes out.   Hello, Triggers for standing up, triggers for the house of cards to fall.   Elizabeth diamond






Princess Diana Death Probe: British Media Reports Allegation That Royal's Death Was No Accident


Conspiracy theories are back surrounding the deaths of Princess Diana and her companion Dodi al Fayed, after British media reported allegations that the couple may have been murdered by British special forces.
Despite a $7 million joint French and British police investigation that concluded that Diana, al Fayed and their driver Henri Paul's deaths in 1997 were accidents, a report in The Mirror claims they were allegedly murdered and it was all covered up.
The allegation surfaced at a second court martial of Sgt. Danny Nightingale, who was found guilty of illegal gun possession, The Mirror reported. Among the evidence presented at the trial was a letter from a former soldier's estranged in-laws that makes the claim that the SAS (Special Air Service) "was behind Princess Diana's death," the newspaper reported.
On Saturday, Scotland Yard said that British police were looking into new information that has surfaced in connection with the deaths of Diana and al Fayed, but police declined to say what that new information was.
"The Metropolitan Police Service is scoping information that has recently been received in relation to the deaths and assessing its relevance and credibility," Scotland Yard officials said in a statement. "The assessment will be carried out by officers from the specialist crime and operations command.
"This is not a re-investigation and does not come under Operation Paget," the statement said.
Operation Paget looked into conspiracy theories surrounding Diana's and Al Fayed's death in 1997.
A spokeswoman for Mohammad al FayedDodi al Fayed's father, spokeswoman has provided a statement to ABC News regarding the new allegation that his son was murdered.
"Mr. al Fayed has no comment but notes the Metropolitan Police statement that it is investigating," she said. "He trusts that their investigation will be thorough and awaits the outcome with interest."
Mohammad al Fayed has long claimed that Diana and his son were murdered and victims of a cover-up, but he has lost every case he waged trying to prove that.
The car carrying the couple was traveling more than 85 miles per hour when it hit a concrete pillar head-on in the Place D'Alma underpass, in Paris, on Aug. 31, 1997.
Both were killed, along with the driver, Henri Paul who was later proven to have been under the influence of alcohol at the time.
The main probe into Diana's death was conducted in 2007-08, and ended up with a verdict of "unlawful killing" and "grossly negligent driving" by Paul and also cited the pursuit of the limo the couple was riding in by photographers contributed to the princess of Wales and Al Fayed's deaths.
As conspiracy theories continues to emerge, Diana's former private secretary Patrick Jephson said any new information must be investigated.
"Imagine if somebody came up and said, I have evidence, new evidence, about the Kennedy assassination, would we just say, oh, forget about it. It's obviously not true. No, we'd investigate it," said Jephson.
Buckingham Palace has declined to comment and Scotland Yard was not releasing any more information at the moment.
ABC News' Susan Donaldson James contributed to this report.
Also Read




Monday, August 19, 2013


The Guardian: Glenn Greenwald: detaining my partner was a failed attempt at intimidation




Glenn Greenwald: detaining my partner was a failed attempt at intimidation

The detention of my partner, David Miranda, by UK authorities will have the opposite effect of the one intended
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/18/david-miranda-detained-uk-nsaGlenn Greenwald

The Guardian, Sunday 18 August 2013

At 6:30 am this morning my time - 5:30 am on the East Coast of the US - I received a telephone call from someone who identified himself as a "security official at Heathrow airport." He told me that my partner, David Miranda, had been "detained" at the London airport "under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act of 2000."

David had spent the last week in Berlin, where he stayed with Laura Poitras, the US filmmaker who has worked with me extensively on the NSA stories. A Brazilian citizen, he was returning to our home in Rio de Janeiro this morning on British Airways, flying first to London and then on to Rio. When he arrived in London this morning, he was detained.

At the time the "security official" called me, David had been detained for 3 hours. The security official told me that they had the right to detain him for up to 9 hours in order to question him, at which point they could either arrest and charge him or ask a court to extend the question time. The official - who refused to give his name but would only identify himself by his number: 203654 - said David was not allowed to have a lawyer present, nor would they allow me to talk to him.

I immediately contacted the Guardian, which sent lawyers to the airport, as well various Brazilian officials I know. Within the hour, several senior Brazilian officials were engaged and expressing indignation over what was being done. The Guardian has the full story here.

Despite all that, five more hours went by and neither the Guardian's lawyers nor Brazilian officials, including the Ambassador to the UK in London, were able to obtain any information about David. We spent most of that time contemplating the charges he would likely face once the 9-hour period elapsed.

According to a document published by the UK government about Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act, "fewer than 3 people in every 10,000 are examined as they pass through UK borders" (David was not entering the UK but only transiting through to Rio). Moreover, "most examinations, over 97%, last under an hour." An appendix to that document states that only .06% of all people detained are kept for more than 6 hours.

The stated purpose of this law, as the name suggests, is to question people about terrorism. The detention power, claims the UK government, is used "to determine whether that person is or has been involved in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism."

But they obviously had zero suspicion that David was associated with a terrorist organization or involved in any terrorist plot. Instead, they spent their time interrogating him about the NSA reporting which Laura Poitras, the Guardian and I are doing, as well the content of the electronic products he was carrying. They completely abused their own terrorism law for reasons having nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism: a potent reminder of how often governments lie when they claim that they need powers to stop "the terrorists", and how dangerous it is to vest unchecked power with political officials in its name.

Worse, they kept David detained right up until the last minute: for the full 9 hours, something they very rarely do. Only at the last minute did they finally release him. We spent all day - as every hour passed - worried that he would be arrested and charged under a terrorism statute. This was obviously designed to send a message of intimidation to those of us working journalistically on reporting on the NSA and its British counterpart, the GCHQ.

Before letting him go, they seized numerous possessions of his, including his laptop, his cellphone, various video game consoles, DVDs, USB sticks, and other materials. They did not say when they would return any of it, or if they would.

This is obviously a rather profound escalation of their attacks on the news-gathering process and journalism. It's bad enough to prosecute and imprison sources. It's worse still to imprison journalists who report the truth. But to start detaining the family members and loved ones of journalists is simply despotic. Even the Mafia had ethical rules against targeting the family members of people they felt threatened by. But the UK puppets and their owners in the US national security state obviously are unconstrained by even those minimal scruples.

If the UK and US governments believe that tactics like this are going to deter or intimidate us in any way from continuing to report aggressively on what these documents reveal, they are beyond deluded. If anything, it will have only the opposite effect: to embolden us even further. Beyond that, every time the US and UK governments show their true character to the world - when they prevent the Bolivian President's plane from flying safely home, when they threaten journalists with prosecution, when they engage in behavior like what they did today - all they do is helpfully underscore why it's so dangerous to allow them to exercise vast, unchecked spying power in the dark.

David was unable to call me because his phone and laptop are now with UK authorities. So I don't yet know what they told him. But the Guardian's lawyer was able to speak with him immediately upon his release, and told me that, while a bit distressed from the ordeal, he was in very good spirits and quite defiant, and he asked the lawyer to convey that defiance to me. I already share it, as I'm certain US and UK authorities will soon see.